Riluzole


CAS No. : 1744-22-5

(Synonyms: PK 26124)

1744-22-5
Price and Availability of CAS No. : 1744-22-5
Size Price Stock
5g $12 In-stock
20g $20 In-stock
25g $21 In-stock
100g $83 In-stock
200 g Get quote
500 g Get quote
We match the lowest price on market.

We offer a substantial discount on larger orders, please inquire via [email protected]

or Fax: (86)21-58955996

Inquiry for price and availability only. Please place your order via our email or fax.

Cat. No. : HY-B0211
M.Wt: 234.20
Formula: C8H5F3N2OS
Purity: >98 %
Solubility: H2O : 1 mg/mL (ultrasonic;adjust pH to 3 with HCl);DMSO : 100 mg/mL (ultrasonic)
Introduction of 1744-22-5 :

Riluzole is an anticonvulsant drug and belongs to the family of use-dependent Na+ channel blocker which can also inhibit GABA uptake with an IC50 of 43 μM. IC50 & Target: Sodium channel[1]
IC50: 43 μM (GABA receptor)[1] In Vitro: Riluzole is an anticonvulsant drug and belongs to the family of use-dependent Na+ channel blocker which can also inhibit GABA uptake with an IC50 of 43 μM. At 20 μM, Riluzole inhibits peak autaptic IPSCs only slightly but prolongs IPSCs reliably. It is also found that Riluzole causes a strong, concentration-dependent, readily reversible enhancement of responses to 2 μM GABA. At higher concentrations of Riluzole, especially 300 μM, GABA currents exhibit apparent desensitization during prolonged co-exposure to 2 μM GABA and Riluzole. The EC50 of Riluzole potentiation of GABA responses is about 60 μM[1]. In Vivo: In normal naïve rats, systemic injection of Riluzole (8 mg/kg, i.p.; n=6 rats) decreases the duration of ultrasonic but not audible vocalizations evoked by noxious stimulation of the knee joint compare to vehicle tested in the same rats (P<0.05). Systemic application of Riluzole (8 mg/kg, i.p.; n=19 rats) decreases the vocalizations of arthritic rats compare to predrug and vehicle significantly (P<0.05 to 0.001). Riluzole administered into the CeA significantly decreases the duration of audible and ultrasonic vocalizations evoked by noxious stimulation of the knee compare to predrug values (n=8 rats; P<0.05 to 0.01)[2].

Your information is safe with us.